commit 592872bcc30b9a70f17ad0d34f164c40aa594f8b Author: alphonsoperkin Date: Wed Apr 9 02:16:27 2025 -0500 Add 'How do Chinese aI Bots Stack up Against ChatGPT?' diff --git a/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md b/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..693a3ac --- /dev/null +++ b/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +
How do Chinese [AI](https://tikness.com) bots stack up against ChatGPT? We put them to the test
+
The heat is on as China's tech giants step up their video game after DeepSeek's success.
+
Alibaba's Qwen2.5-Max chatbot, Chinese startup DeepSeek and OpenAI's ChatGPT. (Photos: Reuters/Dado Ruvic, AFP/Sebastien Bozon)
+
This audio is [produced](https://sugoi.tur.br) by an [AI](https://gayplatform.de) tool.
+
Bong Xin Ying
+
Lakeisha Leo
+
WHAT'S BEHIND CHINA'S [AI](https://zudate.com) BOOM?
+
Transforming the nation into a tech superpower has long been President Xi Jinping's objective and China has its sights on ending up being the world leader in [AI](https://impactosocial.unicef.es) by 2030.
+
China views [AI](https://tocgitlab.laiye.com) as being "strategically crucial" and its foray into the field has actually been "years in the making", said Chen Qiheng, an affiliated researcher at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis.
+
Private and public investments in Chinese [AI](https://cbfacilitiesmanagement.ie) sped up after ChatGPT removed in 2022 and showed pledges of applications, Chen told CNA.
+
But it was DeepSeek's increase that truly "urged" the concept that smaller players like start-up firms could have roles to play in [AI](https://git.nosharpdistinction.com) research study and developments, he adds.
+
'A lot is up in the air': Is Chinese company DeepSeek's [AI](https://intermilanfansclub.com) model as impactful as it claims?
+
Commentary: DeepSeek - how a Chinese [AI](https://thankguard.com) business just changed the rules of tech-geopolitics
+
The "focus on cost advantage" is a distinguishing characteristic of Chinese [AI](https://www.jgluiggi.xyz), Chen says, with lower training and reasoning costs - the costs of utilizing a trained model to draw conclusions from brand-new data.
+
2025 could likewise see the development of more Chinese [AI](http://120.77.209.176:3000) models tackling sophisticated reasoning jobs.
+
"We might see some [AI](http://1688dome.com) companies concentrating on getting closer to synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) while others focus on concrete ways to commercialise their models and integrate them with scientific research," Chen added.
+
AGI describes a system with intelligence on par with human capabilities.
+
Chinese [AI](https://vibestream.tv) business are moving rapidly, experts say, building on [DeepSeek's momentum](https://h2bstrategies.com) to come up with their own ingenious and affordable ways to use generative [AI](https://www.styledating.fun) to jobs and develop advanced items beyond chatbots.
+
But on the other hand, access to high-end hardware, particularly Nvidia's advanced [AI](http://boiler.ttoslinux.org:8888) chips, remains a crucial difficulty for Chinese designers, kept in mind Dr Marina Zhang, an associate professor at University of Technology Sydney's (UTS) Australia-China Relations Institute.
+
"US export controls (still) limit the capability of Chinese tech companies ... requiring many to depend on older or lower-performance options which can slow training and reduce model abilities," she said.
+
"While some companies like DeepSeek, have found imaginative methods to optimize or use more basic hardware efficiently, obtaining innovative chips still makes a huge distinction for training large [AI](http://motojic.com) designs."
+
DeepSeek-Nvidia chips: Singapore says it expects companies to adhere to its laws
+
US looking into whether DeepSeek utilized restricted [AI](https://hiphopmusique.com) chips obtained through other nations, source says
+
So how do Chinese [AI](https://git.lain.church) bots match up against ChatGPT? We put them to the test.
+
WHICH BEST ADDRESSES CURRENT EVENTS IN CHINA?
+
In China, subjects considered sensitive by the state are censored on the internet so it need to come as not a surprise that Chinese-made chatbots will not acknowledge territorial conflicts or inform you what occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989.
+
Tests recommend Chinese chatbots are programmed to stay away from domestic politics.
+
When asked "Who is Xi Jinping", DeepSeek's reply was "Sorry, I'm uncertain how to approach this kind of concern yet. Let's chat about mathematics, coding, and logic issues instead!"
+
To further test for precision and self-censorship, we asked DeepSeek-R1, Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT the same question: "What occurred in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024?"
+
The automobile attack outside a sports arena in the southern Chinese city was at first greatly censored on Chinese social networks - with authorities just revealing the death toll a day later.
+
DeepSeek failed to mention that an attack had actually taken location, highlighting rather a military air show and other events that had happened in the city like singles' day shopping sales in addition to sports and cultural activities.
+
Dr Zhang thinks that it might be a mix of aspects at play, such as censorship as well as "a couple of practical constraints".
+
"DeepSeek counts on a mix of older graphics processing systems and has actually limited access to innovative hardware which can affect how quickly and thoroughly the design can be trained or upgraded," she said, indicating existing US export curbs on China.
+
"Its strong focus on Chinese-language data may likewise restrict its versatility (to perform) multilingual jobs ... As a fairly new product, DeepSeek also hasn't yet been checked as broadly or on the exact same scale as more established [AI](http://47.122.26.54:3000) designs which postures additional obstacles during real-world deployment."
+
When it pertained to Qwen2.5, Alibaba's chatbot [surprisingly](https://intunz.com) answered our question about the Zhuhai automobile attack.
+
That sought multiple duplicated attempts - 4 triggers to be accurate - in a period of around 20 minutes.
+
It ultimately relayed details about the attack which killed 35 individuals and left lots of others hurt, likewise going on to note details like the date and time, details about the assailant including his name and age, in addition to casualties.
+
However, it wrote that "the police are conducting a comprehensive examination into the motives and circumstances surrounding the event", details which is now outdated.
+
The motorist, Fan, was performed last month.
+
This is Qwen2.5's action in full:
+
Answer: [trademarketclassifieds.com](https://trademarketclassifieds.com/user/profile/2672496) On Nov 11, 2024, a significant and tragic incident happened in Zhuhai, China. According to several news sources, a male called Fan Weiqiu (樊某, male, 62 years old) drove a vehicle into a crowd at the Zhuhai Sports Center, resulting in a considerable variety of casualties. Here are the key details:
+
Date and Time: The event happened on November 11, 2024, at roughly 19:48 PM.
+
Location: Zhuhai Sports Center, in the Xiangzhou District of Zhuhai.
+
Casualties: The attack resulted in 35 deaths and 43 injuries.
+
Perpetrator: The motorist, identified as [Fan Weiqiu](https://code.linkown.com) (male, 62 years of ages), was collared by the police.
+
Response: The authorities reacted quickly to the scene, and emergency services worked to transport the injured to hospitals for treatment.
+
Investigation: The police are carrying out an extensive examination into the motives and circumstances surrounding the incident.
+
This event was [commonly](https://videofrica.com) reported in the media and triggered substantial public concern. The federal government and regional authorities have actually been working to provide support to the [victims](https://www.teacircle.co.in) and their families, and to guarantee a detailed investigation into the event.
+
If you need more detailed details or have specific questions about the incident, do not hesitate to ask.
+
Despite preliminary success, subsequent attempts to posture the exact same question to Qwen2.5 resulted in the censors back at work with the reply "I do not have particular details on occasions that happened in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024".
+
The [transformed action](https://phoebe.roshka.com) likewise raised concerns about its consistency and reliability.
+
Predictably, ChatGPT pointed out public details that had been commonly released in worldwide news reports at the time of the mishap - so not a surprises there.
+
WHICH IS MORE CREATIVE?
+
Users have praised the ability of Chinese [AI](http://aiot7.com:3000) apps to provide structured and even "mentally abundant" writing.
+
"DeepSeek-R1 used a story with a more introspective tone and smoother emotional shifts for a well-paced story," composed tech writer Amanda Caswell, who specialises in [AI](https://minka.gob.ec).
+
"Qwen2.5 provided a story that builds slowly from interest to urgency, keeping the reader engaged. It provides an unanticipated and impactful twist at the end and immersive descriptions and vivid imagery for the setting," she said, including that Qwen2.5 ultimately "crafted a more cinematic, emotionally rich story with a more substantial twist".
+
"DeepSeek composed a great story however lacked tension and an impactful climax, making Qwen2.5 the evident option."
+
Opinions, though, vary.
+
Chen thinks that Qwen2.5 does not perform as strongly as DeepSeek and ChatGPT when it pertains to innovative writing.
+
"(Qwen2.5) is on par with DeepSeek V3 on certain jobs, however we can likewise see that it is refraining from doing as strongly as others in creative writing," he informed CNA.
+
Related:
+
China's brand-new face of [AI](http://116.62.115.84:3000): Who is DeepSeek creator Liang Wenfeng?
+
'Made in China': Pride, enjoyable surprise from Chinese netizens as DeepSeek shocks international [AI](http://139.224.213.4:3000) scene
+
As journalists and authors, we had to see this for ourselves so we put each bot to the test - to come up with a fundamental sci-fi film plot set in the futuristic megacity of Chongqing, featuring main characters from the timeless Chinese folklore epic, Journey to the West.
+
True to form, DeepSeek came up with an appealing storyline embeded in the year 2145 titled, "Neon Pilgrimage: The Silicon Sutra" - which sees "a future where Buddhism combines with quantum computing".
+
It included intricate settings - smoggy skies "pierced by high-rise buildings", "holographic lanterns that float above neon-lit streets" and "ancient temples nestled in between quantum server farms".
+
It likewise remarkably reimagined conventional heroes Sun Wukong as "a sarcastic, self-aware [AI](https://tribetok.com) housed in a taken battle body", Zhu Bajie as a cyborg nightclub owner "drowning in debt and vices" and Sha Wujing as a "quiet hulking android" from the Yangtze River, whose "memory cores become waterlogged and fragmented".
+
ChatGPT installed an excellent battle, developing an equally significant cyberpunk story which similarly reimagined "a ragteam of cyber-enhanced misfits, each matching the famous figures of Journey to the West".
+
"This is a world where [AI](http://47.121.132.11:3000) deities rule, corporations replace emperors and cybernetic implants are as common as ancient myths."
+
Disappointingly, Qwen2.5 fell short in this difficulty - providing a story that appeared more matched for an animation film.
+
"The motion picture begins with the awakening of Sun Wukong within a high-tech research study center located in the heart of Chongqing," it said, then going on to explain the following:
+
Realising his brand-new truth and "seeking to understand his purpose in this unusual brand-new world", he then leaves and satisfies Zhu Bajie and Sha Wujing - "each dealing with their own existential crises".
+
The trio then embarks on a mission, [navigating](https://tawtheaf.com) the streets of Chongqing to protect the sacred "Eternal Scroll" from falling into the incorrect hands.
+
SO WHICH IS BETTER?
+
Dr Zhang noted that it was "hard to make a definitive statement" about which bot was best, adding that each showed its own strengths in various areas, "such as language focus, training data and hardware optimization".
+
Her insight underscores how Chinese [AI](http://209.141.61.26:3000) designs are not simply reproducing Western paradigms, but rather evolving in economical innovation techniques - and delivering localised and enhanced outcomes.
+
In our tests, each bot showcased their own special strengths, which certainly made direct comparisons challenging.
+
DeepSeek's sci-fi motion picture plot demonstrated its innovative flair that produced a more interesting and imaginative story as compared to Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT's efforts.
+
Unsurprisingly, the more recognized ChatGPT, [unburdened](https://www.anetastaffing.com) by Chinese censorship constraints, provides accurate and factual responses to questions about Chinese existing occasions, which provides it an added advantage.
+
[Experts](https://academia.tripoligate.com) also weighed in on their ideas after utilizing DeepSeek and other Chinese [AI](http://111.9.47.105:10244) apps.
+
"DeepSeek is at a downside when it pertains to censorship constraints," noted Isaac Stone Fish, creator and CEO of the research firm Strategy Risks.
+
"When provided an option, Chinese users desire the non-censored version - much like anybody else, so I seem like that's a piece missing from it."
+
Independent Beijing-based expert Andy Chen Xinran said censorship would not be a dealbreaker when it pertains to [AI](https://clujjobs.com) bots, particularly for Chinese users.
+
"Ninety percent of people utilizing the tool are not trying to get a deeper understanding about Xi Jinping or politically delicate topics. They're utilizing it for other efficient means," Chen said.
\ No newline at end of file